Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesStocksEarnInstitutionAI & More
Polkadot Tries Again: Why dotUSD Is a Second Chance, Not a New Idea

Polkadot Tries Again: Why dotUSD Is a Second Chance, Not a New Idea

BitcoinworldBitcoinworld2026/09/09 06:24
By:Bitcoinworld

Key takeaways

  • Referendum 1944 proposes dotUSD, a protocol-owned stablecoin, and is running at roughly 97.5% approval on OpenGov’s Root track.
  • This is Polkadot’s third attempt at native stable liquidity, following Acala’s aUSD collapse in 2022 and the stalled pUSD proposal in 2025.
  • The rollout is deliberately staged: USDT-backed issuance first, DOT collateral vaults and liquidations only in phase two.
  • Treasury commitment is $5 million, split between minting reserves and a dotUSD pair on Asset Hub.
  • DOT gained 42.5% on the week, but the real test is adoption after the vote, not the vote itself.

 

Polkadot is not launching a stablecoin because stablecoins are fashionable. It is launching one because the last attempt in its orbit failed badly enough to leave a scar – and the network has spent four years living with the consequences.

Referendum 1944, titled “dotUSD: A Native Stablecoin for Polkadot,” went on-chain Monday at 11:49 a.m. ET and sits on OpenGov’s Root track, reserved for decisions that touch the protocol itself. Support is close to unanimous: roughly 2.3 million DOT in favor against under 60,000 opposed, about 97.5% approval. DOT responded with a 16.7% single-day move and a 42.5% weekly gain, the strongest among the fifty largest tokens.

 

The part most coverage skips

This is Polkadot’s third pass at the problem. Acala’s aUSD collapsed in 2022 after an exploit minted billions of unbacked tokens, and the fallout effectively removed native stable liquidity from the ecosystem. In 2025, a proposal called pUSD – built on Acala’s Honzon stack – cleared 75% support but stalled amid community objections about who would build it and who would supervise risk. Gavin Wood had already laid out his conditions publicly: full DOT collateralization, governance control by Polkadot itself, and DAI-grade security assumptions.

dotUSD reads as a direct answer to those objections. The design borrows from Liquity v2 rather than Honzon, and the rollout is deliberately staged. Phase one issues dotUSD against a capped USDT-backed buffer – no oracles, no liquidation engine, no DOT price dependency. Only in phase two do DOT vaults, real-time price feeds, and liquidations arrive. The treasury commitment is modest by design: $2.5 million in USDT for minting and $2.5 million in DOT seeding a dotUSD pair on Asset Hub.

 

Why the sequencing matters more than the peg

Overcollateralized CDP stablecoins fail in a predictable way. Collateral drops, liquidations queue up, thin exchange liquidity turns orderly unwinding into a cascade, and the peg breaks before the mechanism can respond. By deferring DOT collateral until liquidity exists and the machinery has been tested, Polkadot avoids the exact failure mode that killed its predecessor. A stability pool absorbs liquidated positions instead of dumping collateral into open markets.

There is a reflexive economic story too, and traders clearly noticed it. Every dollar of dotUSD minted in phase two locks up more than a dollar of DOT, converting stablecoin demand into structural demand for the collateral asset. That mechanism is real, but it only activates in phase two – and only if anyone actually wants to hold dotUSD.

 

The harder question

Sovereignty is the strategic case: if Tether or Circle ever restricted access on Polkadot, the ecosystem currently has no fallback. That argument is sound. Adoption is the unsolved part. Native stablecoins do not win on ideology; they win on liquidity depth, integrations, and yield. Polkadot’s DeFi footprint remains small, and $5 million buys a beginning, not a market.

 

Conclusion

The vote will pass. The interesting period starts afterward, when dotUSD has to earn usage rather than approval – and when phase two decides whether Polkadot learned the right lesson from aUSD or merely rewrote it.

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

Updated: Delta Air Lines warns that as fuel prices hit profits, airline capacity will tighten further

Delta Airlines lowers its annual profit forecast due to an expected increase in fuel costs to $6 billion. The CEO stated that ticket prices have risen by about 20% this year, with limited passenger resistance. Analysts warn that maintaining high ticket prices in 2027 is critical for improving profitability. The article includes comments from the earnings call and analyst remarks. Rajesh Kumar Singh/Shivansh Tiwary, Reuters Chicago, October 9 - Delta Airlines (DAL.N) said on Friday that, despite strong travel demand and rising ticket prices, soaring fuel costs have forced it to cut its 2026 profit expectations by nearly a quarter. So, the airline industry may need to further limit flight growth next year to protect profitability. This warning highlights the increasingly tough challenges faced by U.S. airlines. While strong demand and restricted seat growth have allowed airlines to significantly raise ticket prices and offset higher fuel costs, aggressively increasing flights to capture more demand may intensify competition, making it harder to maintain high fares and protect profits. Based in Atlanta, Delta now expects its annual fuel expenditure to increase by about $6 billion compared to last year—about $2 billion higher than its July forecast—due to the Iran war (link) causing global jet fuel prices to spike. Airlines worldwide are preparing for a prolonged fuel shock. Michael O’Leary, CEO of Ryanair Group RYA.I, said Thursday that high jet fuel prices could persist for another 12-18 months (link), adding more pressure on airlines to raise fares and control costs. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/AUTOMATED-20261008/A4A-JET-FUEL-DAILY-1Y/xmpjwjnmbvr/chart.png “In a high-cost environment, you can’t simply grow your way out,” Delta CEO Ed Bastian said on the earnings call. He noted that the industry has already taken steps to restrict capacity, but more measures will be needed next year to improve profitability. Bastian said Delta raised ticket prices about 20% this year, and passenger resistance has been limited. He is confident that even if fuel costs eventually drop, the high fares can still be maintained. Delta lowered its adjusted annual earnings per share forecast from the July prediction of $6.50-$7.50 to $5.10-$5.60. According to LSEG data, the midpoint of the new range is below analysts’ average expectation of $5.46. Third-quarter adjusted earnings per share were $1.72, four cents below analysts’ average forecast. In midday trading, shares of Delta dropped 1.7%, United Airlines UAL.O fell 1.4%, and both American Airlines AAL.O and Southwest Airlines LUV.N were down about 1%. Delta partly shields itself from rising fuel costs by owning a refinery outside Philadelphia (link), which is expected to generate over $700 million in profits this year. Even with this buffer, the airline expects its fourth-quarter fuel price to rise from $3.61 per gallon in Q3 to $4.25 per gallon. Delta forecasts adjusted fourth-quarter earnings per share to be between $1.15-$1.65, with the $1.40 midpoint roughly matching analysts’ average expectation of $1.39. Fare increases Government data shows that in the first eight months of 2026, U.S. airlines spent $42.9 billion on fuel, an increase of $13.2 billion compared to the same period last year despite slightly reduced consumption. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, strong demand and limited seat growth pushed average U.S. airline ticket prices up by about 25% year-on-year between April and August. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-AIRLINES/FUEL/lbpgdnbzwvq/chart.png Analysts at Melius Research said that despite surging fuel costs, Delta’s ability to raise fares helps keep second-half profits roughly stable. Still, they warn that the company’s profit margin has struggled to improve over the years. “It is critical for margin improvement to maintain or raise fares in 2027,” they wrote in their research report. With industry capacity growth expected to accelerate in Q4, this challenge will likely become even tougher. Deutsche Bank analysts expect the proportion of fuel costs recouped through revenue measures to fall in Q4 and predict full recovery won’t happen until early 2027. Bastian noted that low industry returns are another reason for limiting capacity growth. He said Delta will be cautious with its 2027 capacity plan until the fuel price outlook becomes clearer. He added that international routes may account for a larger share of Delta’s capacity expansion compared to domestic routes. Currently, Delta says its premium cabins and corporate travel business remain strong, and its economy cabin business is gradually improving. With Q4 ticket bookings already exceeding 60%, Delta expects revenue to increase about 20% year-on-year, despite limited capacity growth. Executives said early booking trends for Q1 2027 are also encouraging. (For the convenience of non-native English speakers, Reuters automatically translates its reports into several

路透社•2026/10/09 17:36